No they are models/theories based on evidence/data. The difference is that when the data disproves a theory, scientists abandon the theory and don't think that is an easy discipline. Your entire career and reputation my depend on that theory.
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
“The difference is that when the data disproves a theory, scientists abandon the theory and don't think that is an easy discipline.“ How’s that “different”? If they’re willing to abandon it, they don’t view it as “objective truth.” It’s just the closest thing they have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
The communist experiment has been tried many times and always ended in tyranny, starvation and death. When will communists show some scientific method and accept they and it is wrong?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Have I not yet provided multiple examples of communism not ending in tyranny, starvation, OR death? That’s normally like, the first thing people ask. I like MAREZ as a fun example, they’re strapped all the time, yet they’re *still* not killing each other.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @simon_enefer and
Anyway, capitalism kills 18 million people a year and has been responsible for genocides all over the world for the past 600 years. Why doesn’t anyone ever ask capitalists to admit THEY’RE wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
What genocides? Name one. Capitalism is barely 600 years old, and then only existed in a few places like Venice and The Netherlands.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Capitalist genocides include: - The Late Victorian Holocausts (27M) - The Congo Free State (8M) - The Amazon Genocide (250k) - Famine under Decommunization (3-6M) - The Expansion of French Africa (13M) - The Transatlantic, Arab and Ottoman Slave Trades (genocidal byproduct ~40M)
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
1. Victorian holocaust 27m? Based on a single book? Congo more belivable Belgium was an appalling colonial power, but again how is this capitalism fault, colonialism was based on racial superiority, not capitalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Leopold II was ABSOLUTELY motivated by the extraction of resources through capitalist ownership, and even accomplished his tyranny through a proto-PMC. The Belgians didn’t show up just because they wanted people to rule over. They wanted GOLD.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Again, I know little about the early history of colonial Congo, but I have heard it mentioned that Belgiums imperial rule was especially harsh. I would say capitalism doesn't equal greed. Ghengis Khan like gold! It didn't make him a capitalist!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, what makes it capitalist is the means of extracting that gold. Labor and enterprise owned by external, private interests
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.