What? No, he absolutely, 100% violated the ToS. I’m saying *YouTube doesn’t care whether he did or not.* They only care what’s getting reported, and what’s making bad press.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They were “right,” by the letter of the “law,” to remove him, because he broke the rules. The main reason they *removed* him was presumably because he kept getting reported, though. Likewise, they reinstated him because a bunch of people complained at them about the removal.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I actually *don’t* at all support Alex Jones getting removed (despite having an indirect, very tasteless role in inciting threats and harassment), but the Sandy Hook lawsuits did make him a legal and press liability to YouTube, so it makes sense they’d shut ‘im down.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol, CNN is sensationalist garbage, what do you expect from me there? Here: w/o having to look at their Covington piece, I can unequivocally denounce all aspects of CNN, with the *slightest* of exceptions given to Cooper and Tapper for being vaguely info-taining
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The biggest reason is the difference in press— MSM ain’t gonna attack itself so readily— but YouTube never hosted the article. They wouldn’t be a part of it. (plus maybe the article isn’t that bad? haven’t looked at it)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I wouldn’t doubt it, and if so, good thing they’re being sued! Hopefully they can get the thing shut down, and CNN viewers will have to find an actual source
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.