After you "stopped by" @Aion_Network 's Telegram but then abandoned the discussion, I wrote a response. Maybe you'll have some answers this time (but I'm not holding my breath):http://reddit.com/r/AionTrader/comments/9d6ha4/technical_comparison_of_all_interoperability …
-
-
-
I consider any point about my employment by parity as an ad hominem attack, I’m paid by parity to write articles but that doesn’t disqualify any technical points. Note that I am not so critical of the other networks, because there is less to criticise (cont...)
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Since you're addressing blockchain security, why is there no mention in this article about
@ParityTech@polkadotnetwork history of hacks?
. July 2017: Parity multi-sig wallets hack, $30 million stolen
. Nov 2017: Parity hack of $162 million of Polkadot ICO funds lost forever. -
Because, in my opinion, it’s not relevant. That is my honest opinion and isn’t affected by my association with Parity. Obviously I understand how people’s trust is rightfully affected but it’s not pertinent to this article.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Feedback, if you're open: > Cosmos is an IBC protocol Cosmos implements IBC to facilitate blockchain interoperability; we implement two protocols in cosmos (namely: IBC & Tendermint). It's also worth noting that Cosmos coined the term IBC. Like Polkadot, 'zones' = 'parachains'
-
IBC in Cosmos is intended to be a generic interblockchain TCP/IP equivalent, meaning arbitrary payloads beyond just tokens can be supported in the near future. We're just doing it a step at a time. Arbitrary messages aren't 'second class' but an iterative improvement.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
On the note of security, what about the hack - not once but twice - on polkadot? Seems a little bit..less say bias... gooooo team polkahwho?
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Your entire understanding of Aion Network & bridges is flawed: “Aion is a blockchain for implementing and incentivising one-way bridges between two chains” Aion Network ≠ Aion blockchain Aion Network = Aion blockchain + Private/Public/Spoke Chains + crosschain two-way bridgespic.twitter.com/1NeJ1aEXtp
-
That doesn’t invalidate any of my points as far as I can tell, it’s purely a mistake in naming
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.