I had to read this twice to (mostly?) understand it. The logic of the argument is precise, but hidden in an exquisite bejeweled puzzle-box: playful misdirections, riddles, apparent non-sequiturs whose relevance the reader suddenly realizes much later... I love this stuff!
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Because the content is important, I'm tempted to write a summary extracting the main points, for those who might not take the time to solve the puzzles. That would spoil the fun for other readers, though.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I haven't seen any riddle. What I caught, please tell me if you think I'm missing something big: - Exploration of: + Indexicality + Epistemology as a Game with rules + Myths as not even Indexical Knowledge, but mere Indexes/Pointers - Application of this to social science
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.