David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2010.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. Odgovor korisniku/ci
  2. prije 4 sata

    “Passing over these considerations may result in predictable patterns of rationalist failure.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. prije 10 sati
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Yes, exactly! Here’s some text from what will be the next page:

  4. prije 10 sati

    “Aspects of the Theory of Breakfast” Formal rationality is not much help in making an omelet! Here’s a better way… The title is a play on Noam Chomsky’s “Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,” a founding text in cognitivism.

  5. prije 12 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:
  6. prije 15 sati

    🆕 Summary of "mere reasonableness," with a Gigantic Chart and an application: breakfast!

  7. 2. velj

    Unexpected discovery: Keith Stanovich has a chapter on “metarationality” in his 2010 “Decision Making” book. He uses the word to mean evaluating preferences in a formal decision-theoretic framework. Which is important, and consistent with my use, but a much narrower conception.

  8. 1. velj

    🆕 Much of my explanation of how and why rationality works (the middle part of the book) is a simplified presentation of ethnomethodological concepts and findings in easier language. It’s hip! You need to be able to say “ethnomethodology” confidently

  9. 30. sij

    The part of your brain that tries to explain everything in terms of wooden spoons.

  10. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Not sure I understand? I take CR as boiling down to “the important thing is solving problems, which you do by finding a better way of dealing with them”; but that’s not really very helpful. And also, it isn’t even true:

  11. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Here’s a more detailed version of that critique of critical rationalism, suggesting we need a better theory :)

  12. 29. sij
  13. 27. sij

    Research communities should take responsibility for revising their epistemic norms. Psychology has developed a scenius—a creative subcultural ferment that is collaboratively rethinking fundamental assumptions. Yay! The is a great window into the scene.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. 27. sij

    This can be fixed! It will take serious rethinking of how science is done, and how and why it works. Sciences must continually reflect on whether their current approach/research program is genuinely productive, or meaningless mechanical paper-generation.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 27. sij

    In addition to the replication crisis, we have a generalization crisis (per the paper of which discussed). Probably this is as pervasive across sciences, and as misleading, as "most published findings are false."

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 27. sij

    Research programs consider what technical results *mean*, not just whether they are true. That’s the most interesting and satisfying work, for me personally. And as the guys say, they went into psychology to have Big Ideas, not to test tiny truths.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. 27. sij

    A dishwasher! You invented a dishwasher! Very nice! Now PLEASE stop suggesting household robots are imminent!

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. 27. sij

    Wild claims for AI that do not follow from an experiment are the one thing that trigger me into irrational sputtering hostility on twitter. episode helped me understand why I get so annoyed by “AlphaGo models human intuition.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. 26. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Thanks! This has been on my shortlist for a while. Looks to be an excellent corrective. The approach he advocates is probably not currently suitable for soc psych, although cog psych does use multi-level models of this sort:

  20. 24. sij

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·