Michael Daniels

@mdaniels5757

[Insert amusing statement here.] Tufts '22 🐘🐘🐘. he/him

Medford, MA
Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @mdaniels5757

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @mdaniels5757

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Smartest thing I've seen all night: decided to give a victory speech in Iowa without knowing the results--but stealing the spotlight from all the other candidates.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Having a disruption in the Iowa caucus is a flashing red warning sign for the November general election. Democracy only works if voters trust that the results are accurate. We've facilitated bad election systems & failed to penalize bad actors from falsely warning of bogus fraud

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is going to fan the flames of conspiracy theories instead of get people to realize that caucuses are an incompetent way to choose a nominee. It's up to candidates themselves to reassure their voters that the vote is accurate—I'm not kidding—candidates have a huge role here

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    What time might we get a winner?...

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The greatest alarm over slow results tonight seems to be from .... cable news hosts. MSNBC chyron: “MOUNTING QUESTIONS ABOUT LACK OF RESULTS OUT OF IOWA” Are questions really mounting? Or are journalists just bummed that they have to fill air time?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Broke: Hanging chads Woke: Broken Apps

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I’m not necessarily trying to save the Iowa caucus (I seriously think it should be moved to hawaii) or anything but the reason that the conventional wisdom is congealing against it is that a bunch of pundits want to go to sleep.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Tom Steyer: "there is a real reason for this campaign to exist" 😬

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    It's an amazing trope of Trumpism to constantly invoke the 63 million people who voted for him, rather than the percentage of Americans who voted for him.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    "What do you mean I can't caucus for both Warren AND Klobuchar", exclaims Iowa caucusgoer realizing they've been done wrong by the New York Times Editorial Board.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Cable news somehow provides less than zero information about ongoing events.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    oh god, here we go again this is the sort of stuff you're taking into account when you call "the winner" based on 'state delegate equivalents' rather than based on either round of the popular vote.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    he doesn't seem receptive

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    you could get a 4th winner, as the 41 pledged delegates for the NATIONAL convention could conceivably differ yet again from each of the 3 counts below. [sorry to have to do this to everyone]

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I fear young people are under the false impression that the Trump years are zanier than the Bush years. The vice president shot a guy in the face, the president got a black eye and tried to convince us a pretzel did it, and a top advisor resigned bc of his shoplifting problem

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Thanks for the idea ! Finally putting Grindr’s explore feature to good use 😂

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This 2008 tweet is being RTd by some folks to make it look like we’re reporting Biden is dropping out. He’s not. The tweet is from 2008.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I appreciate the Seattle Field Office meeting with us today. For the first time, we were able to hear that there was indeed a breach of protocol & that a large number of Iranian Americans were inappropriately targeted.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Hi It looks like you're trying to predict elections results with a few anecdotal observations about turnout in random precincts. Can I help you throw your computer out the window?

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Iowa is charming and everything but let’s all admit that if we saw this sloppy, chaotic, slap-dash voting system employed in another country we’d call for UN election monitoring.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·