I saw some screenshots the other day. He basically argues putting woman on a 1-10 PLUS a demerit system. Essentially no woman can have sex above her number (she won’t have sex w/men better looking than her) and she loses demerit points for each sexual partner. Fucking crazy.
-
-
-
Whoaaaaa
-
Surprised the NYT published it. I don’t study ancient history but I can’t think of any society that has ever forced women to trade sex in an artificial economy like what he is purposing. He basically wants a slave economy of women, but only Stacys

-
NYT has gone off the rails on a crazy train. This is just clickbait, and people are clicking, I guess.
-
The NYT lost the plot long ago.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please let me know when you get screenshots or a mirror or something. I also don't want to give Douthat traffic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this is the same article there are some screenshots in the comments.https://twitter.com/heerjeet/status/990331577212325889?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I unfortunately read it but feel like this thread hit the lowlights https://twitter.com/laura_hudson/status/991697297195991040 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.