No, dummy, they are a private company. They aren't legally required to provide anyone a platform, and they can remove anyone from their platform they choose to. Get over it
-
-
-
Replying to @AComputerChip @ahiredgoon and
Imagine not making a single rational point to support yourself
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mcplaysalot @ahiredgoon and
"They're a private company. This means they're allowed to treat their users like shit." Really don't see your point here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AComputerChip @ahiredgoon and
I know you don't, I'll slow it down. Since it is THEIR platform, THEY decide what happens on THEIR platform. On top of that, they have reasons for their decisions, and they made the right one with crowder.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mcplaysalot @ahiredgoon and
I don't even like Crowder. I hate YouTube because they give into scummy corporations like Vox, so that they can protect their brand. Now users who use their platform have to suffer, because they like money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AComputerChip @ahiredgoon and
I agree, but the scummy corporations are the advertisers that currently hold YT by the balls. They don't understand the power of their platform, so they create adpocalypse instead of aiding the community
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mcplaysalot @AComputerChip and
We all agreed that net neutrality was a good thing. Isp shouldn't be able to control what we view or say because of throttling. Yet when YouTube does it every lefty is for capitalism. YouTube is a cuck being lead by lefty journalist manipulating advertisements.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jasonGo95472415 @AComputerChip and
Well, not exactly the same, because YouTube has no real competition. They are the market, and are able to regulate themselves (why Google, among others, must be broken up)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mcentangled @AComputerChip and
That's for providing another point for them not being able to censor people. If they are a monopoly then it isn't a free market it's a monopoly. Also saying it's a free market is kinda retarded because we don't have one. Its all regulations and restrictions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course we're not free market. It doesn't matter what state the company is in, they can still censor hate speech all they want.
-
-
Replying to @mcplaysalot @AComputerChip and
Hate speech is federally protected as free speech. If an American corporation won't protect the rights of it's countries citizens then government regulations will be put I place. Already there's a law proposal to do just that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.