If you want to present a challenge to the user-- at least, short of basing the challenge on reflexes-- you have only a few options.
So Video games. They're mechanisms. By nature. Theyre turing machines. They have a set of cells, and a set of states each cell can be in.
-
-
-
You have to disguise the cells, disguise the states, make it nonobvious what state to put the cells in, or make it nonobvious in what order.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Except rogulikes. Yah! We've got an evergreen game design. Randomise the state space and go crazy.
-
nethack's ascension kids say otherwise
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I made a game a few years ago about this: http://romankalinovski.com/#/digital-projects/ … Scroll down to "Black Box."
-
the player is given two views of the game: a graphical representation and a list of all the game's variables
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
PsXXYborg is interesting because the control of physical space means you can dictate player experience to some degree
-
Little bit harder to do that when you're an app someone downloaded on a lark
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
this is fascinating. question: in games that rely on hand-eye coord., the player already sees the cells, but does that matter?
-
hand-eye coordination fixes a lot of things by giving player something else to do. also you can't brute-force if time is limited
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.