Think about the sheer grotesqueness that this wasn't even ruling on the merits, just ruling, no, you need to go ahead and literally kill him as quickly as possible before any lower courts allow him to see a religious figure
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
We are going to see more and more of this, demonstrations that the new Supreme Court is far to the right of virtually any other court in this nation
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The Supreme Court is illegitimate
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Wrong. Majority in procedural order ruled the late filing suggested, pursuant to Gomez, that the filing was designed to manipulate the system. I would have preferred them to look at this on the merits, but the facts are the majority order (not opinion) did not reference 1A
-
He filed 5 days after the jail denied his request. How is that late?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
So religious freedom is a thing of the past in the US
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
-
-
-
No, it was when Garland was denied a hearing. I don't know what he thinks, but when evangelicals cry religious freedom, it's only their own religion.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Regardless of whether judgment was based on procedure or on the merits of the case, either way this accelerates the American public's distrust of SCOTUS & its perception that Court is now a patently political organ of the right. We ALL lose.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

