These are all things news orgs are dealing with too, as audiences fracture across delivery systems. But "this didn't lead the print front page" is simply not an indication in 2018 that it wasn't an important story, or that a news or didn't put weight behind telling it.
-
-
Wrapping up, or getting close to it, this idea of "why isn't the media covering something" when in fact the media IS covering something extensively, is not going to go away. We had this argument about West Virginia this weekend. It'll be something else next month.
Show this thread -
Some news orgs are moving toward personalization. Some put all their eggs in the FB basket (oops). CNN has a massive website that covers all sorts of things you don't see on air there. That means there is no one shared news experience.
Show this thread -
By their behavior and consumption choices, readers and viewers already know this. But it's taking a lot of our brains a while to catch up to this particular reality. That's true about news, specifically, and it's also about a lot of other things about life in 2018!
Show this thread -
I don't have a pithy way to end this. Crap. Uh, here is a gif of Michael Keaton in "The Paper," the very best news movie ever. I think he's probably responding to a reader complaint here.pic.twitter.com/hY7IDUtjWJ
Show this thread -
(Couple of addendum for the new folks in my mentions: -- If your response is "corporate media hates unions," hi hello the NYT newsroom is unionized as are many (but not nearly enough) others. -- I DO have pink hair! Thanks for noticing. Pointing that out is not an insult.)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.