First reference to that stupid groundhog in the New York Times: Feb. 3, 1910 "This is considered a fine proclamation."pic.twitter.com/LAIdvsmJSx
-
-
Replying to @mccanner
In 1931, The Times wrote about the Bronx Zoo's effort to capitalize on this groundhog thing, with a chart to other groundhog resultspic.twitter.com/gKbLOkEIHs
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mccanner
By 1933, New York Times groundhog day headlines had taken a turn for the extremely surreal https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1933/02/03/99209189.html?pageNumber=19 …pic.twitter.com/wypP2PTqV7
1 reply 22 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @mccanner
In the 1975, The New York Times decided to blow the lid off this whole groundhog scampic.twitter.com/MgBvcjZ7hz
2 replies 7 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @mccanner
Meanwhile, in 2017, Groundhog Phil's insta comments are getting dark https://www.instagram.com/p/BQAnLXnjIr2/ pic.twitter.com/EWCT8SaeZ7
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mccanner
in 1997, New York Times coverage managed to ding both groundhogs AND Al Roker at the same time https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1997/02/03/468622.html?pageNumber=21 …pic.twitter.com/6h58Lb9ViJ
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mccanner
"Scoffs" is not a word that we use enough in headlines anymore https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1945/02/03/88190668.html?pageNumber=13 …pic.twitter.com/KF186QbFbH
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.