I took the movie more as an actual meditation on unreliable narration. It's very clear throughout the film each character's version of story includes some (or a lot of) BS. It far more focused on perspective, abusive relationships, etc. than distilling what actually happened.
My biggest problem with that column was absolutely zero retrospection from the author, who glosses over some truths and unreliable narrators because he helps her make a 20-year-old point in an argument no one is havinghttps://twitter.com/mccanner/status/957649984610033664 …
-
-
-
And all that is what makes the film great, in my estimation. It doesn't care what's TRUE as much as what the characters BELIEVED and felt and experienced and claimed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.