“on his side” like “he should be confirmed?” Or “on his side” like “this knowledge isn’t strictly necessary but his lack of prep is still damning?”
So here's a weird thing: that viral video of the judicial nominee bombing at his hearing? Some legal experts actually came down on his side. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/us/politics/matthew-petersen-senator-kennedy.html?rref=collection%2Fbyline%2Fjonah-engel-bromwich&action=click&contentCollection=undefined®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection&referer=https://www.nytimes.com/by/jonah-engel-bromwich …
-
-
-
On his side like "hey internet he's not just a punchline."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm with the people who say that a lack of litigation experience isn't necessarily disqualifying to be a judge, even a trial judge, but the fact that he obviously hadn't done even very basic background Fed Courts For Dummies level homework before the hearing is pretty shocking
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.