No, because there are plenty of other newspapers in the world who do imporant work and will, eventually, succeedhttps://twitter.com/jonathanalter/status/891814534784200705 …
-
-
-
-
Replying to @Maghielse
That's awful optimistic, given history, both recent and not.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mccanner
I do still have perhaps an outsized optimism for the future of good news, with the fallback of knowing I think I'd be a good bartender
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Maghielse
Oh I'm perfectly optimistic about the future of news. Less so on the organizations that double down on print to lead us there.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mccanner
So yes, this was a technicality I think? News organizations, including current "newspapers", but not actual paper
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maghielse
My issue all along was with your word 'newspapers.'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mccanner
I was just using it because that's the term the article used & some places (like yours and I'd think mine globally) are called "newspapers"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Thus the article's central question: not about the last news war, but the last paper war.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.