They could have linked to you :)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the tone of the essay in places is needlessly harsh and fal̞̐l̢̳͒̑s̢̈́ s̬̘̅̆h̥̮͊̅oṛ̋t̩̎ ̣̯̈́̏ó͉͟͝f t̢̆h̛̥é̳ ̨̌̂̀͢͢t̃̄͜͢ḩ̧̤̝̻̋̄̿͗̎o͚̟̱̱̘̓̂̀̒͝ū͚̩̖̜̣̒͋̓̚g̡̼̘͓̘̈͐̀̑͘ȟ͎̫̭̹̊̂̎̈́͜t͕̰͙̔̓̔̾͑͜͜f̡̞͈̫̗̂͑̓̅̄ū̧̩̥͔̀̒͋̔͜l͖͕͈̆̓͋͆̐͟ͅ ̰̻͍͎͒̆̾̓̕͢ą̖̜̜͚̑͆̒̈́̀p̗͉̺̥̬̋͗̈́̂͘p̨̈̈̒̒̃͜͢͜͟ṛ̖̯̤͑͌̊̐͜͠o͐̏̉͠͞
-
I like the part where the misrepresentation of the content of the actual constitution “was intended as a paraphrase” rather than just calling it, say, wrong? A misquote? Or that other thing. But why is the NYT providing an reason for inaccuracy that they can’t (heh) verify?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They literally commissioned the piece, FFS! After platformig Hitler's "The Art Of Propaganda" - no one is surprised. I really don't get the false equivocation of platforming objectively insidious, inflammatory, hateful, bigotted material. It's so dangerous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting that the factual errors specifically called out as being wrong or misleading ... stand in the piece uncorrected
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"We're still A-OK with the idea of having the army kill protesters -- we just need it to be phrased more delicately."
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Has the
@nytimes ever considered NOT publishing racist crap that requires this much correction? Just an idea. -
This never gets old (from The Nib):https://thenib.com/centrist-history/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry we published a sociopath calling for mass murder we forgot to fact check it.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.