You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I know this is meant as a punchline, but it proves a really important point everyone in news should think more about: There are more people *not* reading your stuff than are. What are you doing to change that ratio?what are you making for them? How are you getting it to them?https://twitter.com/ryanbeckwith/status/1109231709411860481 …
That people want to be and are generally informed about the news around them used to be a given. It is, quite frankly, not anymore. It's on this industry to actually reach those people who currently aren't. It's the literal definition of engaged.
News moves so so so fast now, and a lot of people (and stories) get left behind. As an industry, aside from printing it all on paper once a day and delivering it to a small subset of people, we aren't doing everything we can to reach those people.
Completely agree it's an important point. Don't think I agree that those are the right questions to ask in light of it, though
What do you think the right questions are?
People probably forget there are millions of others out there who have no idea what a Mueller even is
Case in point: On Tuesday, I was trying to explain my bet w/ husband about whether baby or Mueller report would arrive first, and the labor & delivery nurses didn't know who Mueller was / anything about the report.
Also don't forget that the entire world doesn't revolve arount the USA. Not a lot of Europeans care or are interested in that sort of stuff.
Isn’t this exactly what the Internet Research Agency got so damn good at playing? Surfing on engagement, and then turning it into polarization?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
