Max Schrems   Ovjeren akaunt

@maxschrems

(Luckily not only) Law, Privacy and Politics. [ after 2 Months] === Due to increasing tensions: Purely destructive/insults = Block 😔

Vienna, Austria
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @maxschrems

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @maxschrems

  1. German DPA calles out for not getting the job done so far -- just talking about budget is too little however, other DPAs get much more done with *way* less resources and personal.. The DPC needs to implement efficient procedures ASAP! 😐

    Poništi
  2. In the 2nd/3rd instance (which any company like Facebook or Google will take it to) the numbers get even tighter: - 17 judges at the Court of Appeal - 9 Judges at the Irish Supreme Court (compare: 63 judges at the Austrian Supreme Court for administrative matters alone)...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. *If you assume that the has about 4k complaints per year and let's say in 10% of the cases a party appeals a decision, then 400 cases a year hit 64 district judges... That's 6,25 cases per year and judge just in the first instance (with oral hearings etc)..

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. PS: The number of judges for Ireland and the UK are so light that they are hardly distinguishable from the ocean.. 😂

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. Simplest way to show that Ireland will be unable to enforce : They don't even have enough judges for appeals of 4k* cases/year..🤨 🇮🇪 Ireland (4,9 M) has 176 judges (1 per 28k) 🇦🇹 Austria (8,5 Mio) has 1700 judges (1 per 5k) 🇩🇪 Germany (83 Mio) has 21339 judges (1 per 3,8k)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. PS: The number of judges for Ireland and the UK are so light that they are hardly distinguishable from the ocean.. 😂

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. Poništi
  8. Submissions by the parties (again) 4. Final decision by the DPC herself 5. Circulation with the other DPAs * Feedback by up to 31 DPAs * Potential need to repeat multiple times until there is agreement 6. Final binding decision ->> appeals in Irish or Austrian Courts..

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. PS: What is especially appalling, is that the DPC argues this would be required by Irish law, when in fact they made this up themselves... * Complaint * Response 1. Investigator's Draft Report * Right to be heard by everyone 2. Investigator's Report 3. DPC's Draft Report (...)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. The came up with an insanely complicated "6 Step" Procedure 's the WhatsApp/FB/Instagram cases - after 20 Months only Step 1of6 is done in one of three cases.. If does not take action, will be as much of a laughing stock as Directive 95/46 was..

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. Die im Burgenland zeigen ja, dass die Stimmen durchaus auch von der "zurückholen" kann.. wenn wir jemals die aktuelle strukturelle "rechte Mehrheit" in Österreich überkommen wollen, wird man davon lernen müssen... 😉

    Poništi
  12. Does anyone know if the UK () is still member of the after January 31st and EU-UK cross-country cases are still falling under the consistency mechanism?

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    allows anyone to read and share local GDPR decisions and knowledge on GDPR Articles, DPAs and Countries! Thank you for this exclusive interview for - Data Protection Officers Network

    Poništi
  14. ...decided against it, as they take such (obvious) questions overly personal, but actually kinda regretting it, because an authority should be able to answer fair criticism and I basically self-censored.. 😐

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Question from the audience: If I want to use your advertising ID, ip adress, location, etc to get you to donate to , would I have a legitimate interest? rep completely dodges the question and Max is cut off.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. I was about to ask Helen Dixon () how it can be soooooo-o-o hard to enforce , when aknowledged on open stage that a good junk of their members violates the law after 3 minutes of intense questions...🙄

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Wow, the just acknowledged that if you don’t have a relationship with the company collecting your data, there is no reasonable expectation, and thus they cannot rely on legitimate interest.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. : Every time an industry person says "we need to the user" they have to say "you are stupid and it's your fault" .. 😜

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    Disheartening point by on the current state of GDPR enforcement. Because of the delays in enforcement, companies are making more $ from illegal activities while waiting for complaint processing, than the sum of any potential fines.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    DPAs will have to run investigations on decision structures in companies, or multinationals will be able to forum-shop by just stating their main establishment is in a certain country, warns .

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·