Dlaczego kaลผda kaลผda miฤdzynarodowa sprawa, ktรณra dotyczy #bigtech, trwa tak dลugo?
Czy mamy szansฤ zatrzymaฤ ลledzenie na potrzeby inwazyjnej reklamy online?
---
Przeczytajcie wywiad z , zaลoลผycielem
Follow
Click to Follow maxschrems
Max Schrems 
@maxschrems
(Luckily not only) Law, Privacy () and Politics. #ScheiรDaNix 
mastodon.social/@maxschrems
===
No tweet without a typo!
mastodon.social/@maxschrems
===
No tweet without a typo!Max Schrems ๐ช๐บโs Tweets
โ๐ฝ๐Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr wrote โ' the more things change, the more they stay the same'
Here, DFFโs explores how this aphorism applies to #AccessToJustice in #DataProtection based on recent developments in the field
digitalfreedomfund.org/access-to-just
๐ท
8
12
Weil wir viele Anfragen zur #GIS bekommen haben. Unsere Kollegen von haben hier mal einen รberblick gemacht was Betroffene tun kรถnnen:
20
29
Zum erneuten #PrivacyShield-Versuch der EU zur Auslieferung unserer Daten an USA und NSA sagte ich EU-Kommissar Reynders gestern: Die EU-Kommission wird zum Wiederholungstรคter bei der Verletzung unserer Grundrechte und buckelt vor den USA!
netzpolitik.org/2022/augenwisc
1
88
147
..ein fairer Preis ist.
Grobe "Michmรคdchenrechnungen" ergeben ein paar Cent (!) Extraverdienst mit personalisierter Werbung, die sich die Nutzer mit โฌ123 pro Jahr "zurรผckkaufen" mรผssen.
Wird spannend wo die "Pay oder Okay" Fรคlle hinfรผhren - vermutlich zum #EuGH! ๐
4
5
29
Show this thread
Gerade aus einer spannenden Anhรถrung der #DSB zum "Pay oder Okay"-Modell (noyb.eu/de/news-seiten).
DerStandard "weiร leider nicht" wie viel sie mit Werbung pro Nutzer verdienen -- wรคre hald notwendig um zu vergleichen ob โฌ8 pro Nutzer fรผr die Einwilligung..
2
10
34
Show this thread
โโThe European Commission has committed to examining every large-scale GDPR case, everywhere in Europe. It will measure how long each procedural step in a case is taking, and what the relevant data protection authorities are doing to progress the case:
46
84
Very InterestIng on actual #GDPR enforcement and the lack of implementation by (many) Member State DPAs:
Quote Tweet
The European Commission will start checking the progress of every โlarge-scaleโ GDPR case across the EU, 6 times a year.
iccl.ie/digital-data/e
Show this thread
25
49
๐ดWatch our lawyer discuss procedural issues in GDPR enforcement with and the at this year's #PrivacyCamp23 :
youtube.com/live/9x8mL-ize
11
15
๐ noyb wins appeal against Spanish DPA: location data is personal data.
The AEPD had previously argued that Virgin telco, a telecommunications provider, had lawfully denied its customers access to their location data:
1
43
71
#LOL: Just in a hearing with LLC on -- is now arguing that the #SCCs that were signed on 12.8.2020 shall have applied RETROACTIVELY since 25 May 2018 #GDPR... ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
#KannstNedErfinden
3
14
50
Quote Tweet
The Irish Times this morning lays out the facts on the DPC's isolation in Europe: zero of the 30 EEA member states at the European Data Protection Board voted with the DPC.
@DerekinBerlin
irishtimes.com/opinion/2023/0
Show this thread
4
10
Show this thread
and perhaps good for Ireland Incโs reputation in Silicon Valley. But if Irelandโs data regulator continues on this path, its EU colleagues will intervene and overrule โ again and again."
1
4
13
Show this thread
(5) "After nearly five years, is the big tech regulatory system Ireland has created โ with lengthy, expensive investigations; damp squib national decisions; legal uncertainty for citizens and companies alike โ delivering the required outcome? It has certainly been good for Meta..
1
2
9
Show this thread
(4) "MEPs [from ] said they agreed with findings of the Dรกilโs own justice committee: the Government needs to overhaul DPC operations and the underlying legislation."
1
2
9
Show this thread
(3) Critics* ... link the interventions to how the Irish regulator โ faced with a choice โ will always choose the most tortuous, lengthy and expensive legal route to a decision rather than a simple application of EU law.
*@NOYBeu was not inverviewed for this article.
2
2
8
Show this thread
(2) So far 6 of 7 interventions by the EDPB concerned the . So far the lost all of them as far as I know.
2
2
10
Show this thread
Very interesting in-depth reporting by / on the #Meta #GPDR fine (irishtimes.com/opinion/2023/0) some highlights:
(1) The vote was 30:1 (4 obstained), when the DPC noted that only some DPAs raised issues. No one sided with the .
2
37
64
Show this thread
6
3
19
WhatsApp Decision: "by refusing to investigate data sharing within Meta, the DPC has unduly limited the scope of the case against WhatsApp."
2
28
40
๐จWhatsApp faces โฌ 5.5 million fine, as DPC limits the scope of the case against WhatsApp and rejects the request to investigate matters like data sharing within Meta:
1
32
37
Official statement by the DPC (don't read through the "narrative" they want journalists to read and instead start at the end):
Quote Tweet
Data Protection Commission announces conclusion of inquiry into WhatsApp: dataprotection.ie/en/news-media/
6
16
Show this thread
#WhatsApp decision is out. At first sight (it's again 112 pages) it seems the finally gives the finger to the :
2
36
81
Show this thread
The "Task Force" now issued a first list of conclusions based on 's roughly 700 #cookiebanner complaints (noyb.eu/en/noyb-aims-e).
On some issues there is still no 100% agreement, but what's there seems to support our push for "fair" banners! ๐๐
Quote Tweet
#Cookie banners : on January 17, 2023, the CNIL and its European counterparts adopted the report summarizing the conclusions of the task force in charge of coordinating the answers to the questions raised by the complaints of the @NOYBeu association 
cnil.fr/en/edpb-adopts
cnil.fr/en/edpb-adopts
read image description
ALT
1
12
30
It's all these "secret" #surveillance systems in the US that make any "representations" of the US Government about the known systems quite meaningless in relation to data transfers under #GDPR:
2
15
28
Quote Tweet
How ignoring a tiny element of the @EU_EDPB decision on Facebook and Instagram allowed the @DPCIreland to give @Meta a โฌ 3.97 billion discount on their #GDPR penalty: noyb.eu/en/irish-data-
5
33
77
โIrish Data Protection Authority gives โฌ 3.97 billion present to Meta?
A first analysis of the recent decisions on Meta's forced consent reveals that the DPC turned a blind eye on the revenue generated from violating the GDPR when calculating its fine:
1
18
22
How ignoring a tiny element of the decision on Facebook and Instagram allowed the to give a โฌ 3.97 billion discount on their #GDPR penalty:
6
60
101
Letโs talk about consent. Do you feel like you ever properly consented to being surveilled online constantly, having a profile built of your interests and having that profile made available to anyone who could pay for it?
EU regulators donโt think so either. /1
17
376
1,340
Show this thread
Picture perfect day in ! ๐โ๏ธ๐
My favorite here: you basically never stand in line - just too big of a resort.. ๐
2
3
45
This is basically โฌ13.3 million per year for the processing without a legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR for millions of European users.
It is these "tricks" that make the DPC look extremely complicit over and over again! ๐
1
7
32
Show this thread
..this likely amounts to millions or billions. All you would have to do is demand the numbers from Meta, or make an estimation if the they don't provide it.
The DPC simply said "we don't know how to ask for the number" and set the fine at โฌ 60 million for the violation.. ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ
1
6
17
Show this thread
In the comparison of the #GDPR decision and the decision there is a Million (or Billion) Euro gift to in the DPC decision:
The EDPB demanded to adjust the fine to the profits made by Meta via illegal data usage under Art 6(1)(b) GDPR. For 4.5 years..
1
24
42
Show this thread
Is figure one the same as figure 2 ? If so, you may be the DPC
1
4
21
Quote Tweet
Court: General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union
T-682/22 - Meta Platforms Ireland v European Data Protection Board
lnkd.in/erxUuuBQ.
Case: Binding Decision 2/2022 on Meta Platforms (Instagram) under Article 65(1)(a) GDPR. See lnkd.in/e43q58ut.
Show this thread
3
6
11
Quite amazing how staff tries to turn a win by into a "3-0" for Meta.
Obviously this decision is full of reframing by the DPC, which was voted into the ground.
Are you sure if you actually read the decision - or is this the new #IAPP spin?!๐
Quote Tweet
The DPC's 'preliminary' and 'provisional' view was that Meta could depart from the general rule - i.e., the core service of Instagram is 'premised on' personalized ads = Meta could rely on performance of a contract . . . this COULD have made it 3-0 to @Meta vs @noyb
Show this thread
2
12
26
Quote Tweet
#ECJ: Every person has the right to know to whom his or her #PersonalData have been disclosed #GDPR @unserepost curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_
curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_2
15
39
2
3
33
๐จDecision published on Meta Advertising Ban ๐จ
The decision clearly shows massive disagreement between the DPC and the . The DPC has (at least on one occasion) even departed from the binding EDPB decision.
Read our first reaction:
2
31
41