Conversation
Replying to
I'd smash it for having next to no argument, piss-poor mapping of the non-existent argument in the intro, weak critical engagement with sources, and terrible paragraph structures. Whoever wrote the AI doesn't know how to write an essay.
3
1
All good points, but how would a marker identify this as an AI generated paper as opposed to one written by a weak student?
2
3
First, take a look at the references. There is a real published paper with the title "The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention", but in a different year. The Cepeda et al. is fake (though the authors have written other papers with similar titles).
2
3
Why does the AI use/generate fake references? And can it be instructed to only use real ones?
Great question. I'm going to ask the developers on the OpenAI community forum.
1