1/ Many NAc studies emphasize reward and prediction error signals at the time of the outcome, but what determines which predictors get the credit, or the blame? New lab preprint showing cue *identity* coding in the rat NAc:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/04/13/300251.full …
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
2/ Other notable findings: stubborn encoding of location even when irrelevant to reward prediction, and tiling of task space rather than discrete cue- and outcome responses. Next steps: can we predict what is actually learned from NAc activity patterns? Feedback much appreciated!
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
A very helpful round of reviews prompted us to streamline the analysis in the new version, which communicates the main points much more clearly. Paper now officially out!https://elifesciences.org/articles/37275
0 replies
5 proslijeđenih tweetova
13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.