Thom Hartmann adds to what you are saying, in a nutshell.pic.twitter.com/lYlOsvcCf0
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Thom Hartmann adds to what you are saying, in a nutshell.pic.twitter.com/lYlOsvcCf0
Sorry Matt this tweet makes you stupid, Trump stupid, Ryan liar stupid. You do more of A >B rises.
"but Deficits Do Matter" said NO Democrat EVER
Wait, I thought tax cuts always pay for themselves w/the economic growth they create. That's what orthodoxical Republicanism always tells us. Was that a lie?
Matt stop following the snowflakes and the Democrats we're going to teach you how
Fiscal Conservatives believe in balanced budgets, restraining deficit spending and reducing the national debt. The GOP of 2017 ask what's in it for me? Political expediency over principle is the new norm in GOP.
When has reducing tax rates resulted in a drop in federal gov tax revenue? (never) Whole tax rate cut = bigger debt is bogus. Why keep this up? Past problem - gov revenue went up, politicians went spending crazy. THAT is problem. Think you know that.
This is so wrong as to be intentional. Kansas 2012, Reagan 1980 tax cuts raised the deficit from $1T to $2.5T. In fairness, and he raised taxes twice to offset. Bush tax cuts came coupled with low interest rate and likely spurred growth. Please read up on the Laffer curve
Gov revenues do not go down due to tax rate reductions. Tax rate reductions have always resulted in increased econ activity=increased revenue. Debt in 80s went up (after early 80s recession) due to massive spending increases.
Nope. Tax revenue decreased 200b first four years of the 80s. Then Reagan increased taxes in 82 83 84 and 87. Eventually revenues raised by the end of the 80s but the reasons are not certain enough that I would ever say “always”.
As I said, early 80s recession. Gov revenues are driven by economic activity much much more than by tax rates. Lower taxes spur econ activity = increased gov revenue.
That’s supposing you’re on the correct side of the Laffer curve. Again it’s your choice of the word always that’s the issue. Nothing else.
Since when? 2016 when @BarackObama added to the deficit more than every previous President COMBINED?
Sure, they matter now that they got their tax cuts passed, so now they will be shocked! shocked! at the level of debt and demand that everything except the defense budget needs to be cut. 
Deficits? Bah. They leave all that for the Dem that follows them to clean up.
true!!
Is there some good writing on the balance between level of taxes and the amount of government services "we the people" accept and desire respectively? I find the "keep more of my money" vs " robbing the public treasury" tropes to be lacking.
You're talking about an anti-establishment view, because the biggest draw of funds away from those 'government services' is military/discretionary spending, which has wide bipartisan support.
I was just asking a question. 
Just trying to give you some perspective. Maybe check out Counter Punch or WSWS?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.