This is not a rhetorical question. Is there a legitimate argument for his doing this?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its was already owned by a Canadian company. The U.S. didn't own it.
-
Sale still had to be approved by POTUS.
-
9 government agencies had to approve the sale. Why did any of them approve it?
-
Yes, I’m genuinely curious. Why did they?
-
I would have to hope that there was some way the U.S. as country benefited from it, but I don't think that has been proven yet. :-/
-
Tweet unavailable
-
How does that affect our national security?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's no answer that wouldn't make them both look terrible -- hence the media silence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was that an interesting question to you in 2012 or 2013 when he was in office or just trying to rationalize your unhinged party now.
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I am sure that he got a shit load of money like the Crooked Clintons did
-
Yes. Thanks for interjecting that our POTUS was paid off by Russia with absolutely no proof.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the Uranium can't legally leave the country (It can't BY LAW) then where was the harm?
-
Clarification, Uranium One (Co. in ?) would need an export license, they don't have one. Original deal was 4 U.S. Processing Plant.
-
Said plant, hasn't had ore transferred to it in 10 years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.