Article doesn't help ur argument. Pretty much only thing\ it questioned is whether 30 Million get kicked off. Everything else is right
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if GOP wanted to protect lifetime caps and preexisting condition coverage no need to change language from the mandate in ACA. Deliberate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IDK man, seems like Politifact says Kimmel's reading is reasonable if in places unverifiable because the Senate is skipping the CBO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Care to compare
@jimmykimmel politifact record to@realDonaldTrump and see who's most accurate? Anyway,@ChuckGrassley sums it up best:pic.twitter.com/EHsdRU8zQB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How dare thou question thy Lord
#Kimmel!
The Left's savior. -
Grow up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then let's argue on that merit and not on his celebrity status.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Main issue in question is how many people will lose coverage; that is uncertain because GOP wants to avoid a complete analysis by CBO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Example, please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shouldn't ignore the coverage facts they say are unverifiable are deliberately unverifiable because the GOP won't allow CBO score in time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
by that logic *every politician* who says untruths about a bill should never be heard from publicly again on the issue. good luck with that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.