Option 2 requires destroying the underlying architecture of Obamacare. Thus, neither coherent option can be done via reconciliation.
-
-
-
The GOP chose option 3: An incoherent hodgepodge that is the worst of both worlds and pleases nobody...
-
Here's my column on why conservatives can never be satisfied with the Senate GOP bill.http://www.thedailybeast.com/is-real-free-market-health-care-even-possible …
-
And here's last night's
@AC360 TV segment on the 2 coherent options (bipartisan and free market) being ignored.https://www.facebook.com/MattLewisDC/videos/vb.219060134788557/1698566773504545/?type=3&theater … - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This means that option 1--a bipartisan fix--is much more plausible.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And a bipartisan fix would be a stunning achievement by this president*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
W Buffet says single payer system.
only country in west to not have itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I prefer #2!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give healthcare back to free market place. Get health care where you get your other insurances. Keep government out.

-
How?
-
Unlike other insurance, health insurance never discounts for no claims, preventative maintenance, believes a vagina is a pre-existing 1/
-
condition, will go back mo to yrs after paying claims & dispute them & isn't reactive to competition. 2/
-
These are all problems. How do they get fixed?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.