this line from you is 20 times more disingenuous than anything Kimmel said.pic.twitter.com/rp4byV6CD0
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
this line from you is 20 times more disingenuous than anything Kimmel said.pic.twitter.com/rp4byV6CD0
That line is 100 percent factually true.
$26k/year for arthritis. $17k for pregnancy (no complications) .$140k for cancer.pic.twitter.com/DCLlguYvtp
That premium for metastatic cancer is essentially a death sentence. How do you reconcile that with a "pro-life" philosophy?
She worked several of those yrs as a pediatric nurse, saw her kids get married and have grandchildren - couldn't do that w/$140K/yr premiums
Here's a pro-tip for another insipid pro-lifer: Being for the little guy means supporting his parents. Because that's all he's got, esp. . .
after you've stripped away early childhood programs and public education support. And that doesn't even get into this...
ridiculous premise that neonatal intensive care is free. The bills for my twins were $50,000 each. And believe me, the insurance...
companies go after thing they can get. Deductibles, co-pays. They argue that certain treatments were unnecessary. Even with good insurance,
The bill is hefty. If you don't have insurance or can't pay those bills, you go into collection. And for poor parents, that means a lot...
less to spend on the little guy, plus an enormous amount of time and energy wasted that would be better spent working & caring for their son
But let's say Medicaid kicks in and all are forgiven. You know that does? It pays for a low percentage of costs and those costs...
Are then shifted to the rest of the system and all of us who use it. ER health care has been a major driver of sky-rocketiing costs.
Incredibly disingenuous. Your baby will get emergency care, yes; your life will then be ruined forever if you can't afford the massive costs
THAT'S the choice. Lifesaving care for your child or financial ruin. That's what Kimmel is protesting. This isn't just medicaid recipients
They call you names, perhaps, because when they respond with facts, numbers, and details that contradict your argument, you ignore them.
... or block them.
fuck you, trashscum
What did you say? -ah that freedom of speech first amendment where everyone gets to say what they feel... only majority decides who's right.
No, because Kimmel is rich and can afford the bills to take care of his son. I remember that much from his explanation on CNN last night.
That's what Matt said? Yikes... so all rich people shouldn't be affected by poor ppl at Children's hospital that can't afford 300k?
Jimmy is a good guy went to Jr high with him-he donates computers to Clark High School to this day always pays it forward. 1.)
This effected him. I have a friend who's son had the same surgery. Nothing worse than seeing your child sick...and seeing others?
Knowing you can afford to care for your child but they can't because of insurance companies? When did GOP start defending Corp over people?
Even medical experts say "this is a bad bill" example: like Ann Romney, I have MS. She can afford all the treatments-I cannot.
That's not her fault nor anyone else's but congress should not make it harder for the rest of us to pay for healthcare-period.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.