Rand Paul made a big deal of wanting repeal and replace to happen simultaneously. Now he says he wants separate bills (but on the same day)
-
-
Then, Rand Paul gets to pass the hot potato and blame someone else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's what I was wondering!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what they assume would happen. They want the political benefit of repeal, more important than replace for them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good point, but you'd think someone would have a whip count to know if something will pass before going forward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would the repeal (and replace), have a sunsetting provision (i.e., 1/1/18)? If not, why not? A window mitigates that risk, no?
@mattklewisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Presumably, you don't bring either bill up for a vote until you're sure you have enough votes for both (which they never will).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.