Not mutually exclusive!
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because the only possible outcomes would be petty and irrational reactions... nice.
-
uh, Trump is involved here, so yeah.
-
Trump personally is one thing. But that's a pretty gross statement to make about 45-50% of the US population.
-
also, nowhere near that fraction of American ppl support him
-
Also, I said "Prominent" Trump supporters.
-
Fair enough. But realize that's the same as saying "Would prominent HC supporters blame sexism or white power?
-
uh, no. Neither of those involving distancing themselves from their own publicly stated positions.
-
That's exactly what I took issue with originally-- that the only two "options" were positions that did just that.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Donald who??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A but after the meltdown B
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so introspection unlikely?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A. And if so, they should go.. er, go Trump themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blame NeverTrumpers. Few have their candidate’s gift for shameless denial of prior statements.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@josh_hammer Initially A, then once the shame sets in BThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
great question. Prob a pretty even split, leading to infighting between the two groups. Expect great leaks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.