with all due respect, might I suggest using the term "man to beat" in 2016 about anyone re 2020 is just a little completely bonkers insane?https://twitter.com/mattklewis/status/783731759221309440 …
@allahpundit it's wildly premature, but not absurd. Trump is likely to lose, & history suggests Hillary might be a one-termer.
-
-
also, why assume that Trump won't run again and win the nomination?
-
again, the premise of my theory is that the GOP tries to marry Trumpism w/ traditional conservatism.
-
he'll have to give them something -- on trade, etc., that could alienate more conventional side
-
yep. I think it's a populist/protectionist/border-wall party that sounds kinder & gentler than Trump.
-
Yeah, problem for trying to be half Trump, is somebody w. nothing to lose is gonna run full Trump
-
sadly, that might work in a primary (it's also repeating the same mistake & hoping for a diff result)
-
it's also possible there are multiple constituencies that could get you to the nomination. trump cobbled together protectionist/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really? How does history suggest she might be a one-termer?
-
for one thing, she would be the fourth consecutive two-termer.
-
Doesn't seem to support your point. ;) But I'm interested in any other data you have!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
History also suggest losing VP candidates don't go far
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.