it wasn't his hypocrisy. He said the very same things about civic nationalism then and frequently. Voters different.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Uttering platitudes from stained glass attitudes."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did it make you more likely to vote Hillary? Cause a good speech isn't judged by how many people say "Great speech!"
-
..but a good speech can most definitely influence those who are persuadable.
-
But was it influential? In this case I suspect speaker's main goal was having people praise speech.
-
..time will tell, I suspect it actually was. People seek unity, human nature.
-
It was a great farewell speech for his legacy. But didn't match nation's mood or her "change agent" messaging.
-
ppl are enthusiastic about change if its a change for the better..the Dems are laying out the case that it's not.We'll see
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.