You are saying you don’t understand the Democrats’ refusal to utter certain terms is indicative of their approach?https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/673561575110918144 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidLimbaugh
@DavidLimbaugh Both terms correctly identify the threat.3 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn@DavidLimbaugh agree. Why is 'Islamists' more PC or specifically appropriate than 'radical Islam'?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @mattklewis
@mattklewis@DavidLimbaugh It isn't. Just a way for Hillary to avoid appearing to cave to GOP.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn@mattklewis@DavidLimbaugh question is not what's more "PC," it's what's most useful in waging "hearts & minds" war2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billscher
@billscher@McCormackJohn@DavidLimbaugh so why is 'Islamists' superior to 'radical Islam' in that regard?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattklewis
@mattklewis@McCormackJohn@DavidLimbaugh probably isn't http://www.vox.com/2015/11/16/9745334/obama-radical-islam-isis …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billscher
@billscher@McCormackJohn@DavidLimbaugh so you're saying George W. Bush had it right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattklewis
@mattklewis@McCormackJohn@DavidLimbaugh "global struggle against violent extremism" works for me http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/26/politics/us-officials-retool-slogan-for-terror-war.html …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@billscher @McCormackJohn @DavidLimbaugh the rise of a group called the "Islamic State" has made it harder to maintain these euphemisms.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.