@mattklewis @sheila14all Supreme Court is no different than any other entity. They vote their interpretation and go have a cold one.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Roberts believes 'only the 1% matters. It was destroying the court. Don't worry he'll return to con b/s shortly.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis I think an apt comparison is Thomas Becket as Archbishop of Canterbury. Institutional legitimacy over ideology.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis thanks for making me more depressed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
@mattklewis I give Roberts consistency. It would have been crazy to uphold in the first case, and overturn this one. That's anarchy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis A Supreme Court judge is to interpret laws, not be groomed to vote partisan. "Incubate" him? That's playing politics.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis@thomasa56 Something is not right...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis It really is nauseating. He knows that most people don't understand what he's done.@EdMorrisseyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis@EdMorrissey Look at who appointed him as well. He deserves a heapin' helpin' of blame too. -
@RJCHVZ@mattklewis@EdMorrissey I think he had as acceptable a resume as a conservative could ask for. Makes it that. much. worse. No hope.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.