@mattklewis 3) Are we better off w/ Saddam gone even if we would have had right intel & therefore wouldn't have gone in?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis There are three key questions here. 1) Would you have supported based on same intel? 2) Based on what know now? … and ... -
-
@DavidMDrucker@mattklewis The answer is that we don't have the option of deciding, based upon what we know now. He blew a silly question. -
@laura_lrnzo
@DavidMDrucker@mattklewis A good journalist should have realized that he misunderstood the Q & should have repeated the Q. -
@deniseparashac@DavidMDrucker@mattklewis Yeah, well, that's the Kryptonite question, isn't it? -
@laura_lrnzo I think it speaks more to a flaw in Megan Kelly's interviewing style. Q should have repeated w/ emphasis on "know NOW."
-
@deniseparashac Her "style" was to throw him a softball Q, w/o following up. Which she didn't do, bcos he shd have given the obvs answer. -
@laura_lrnzo It should have been obvious that he misinterpreted the Q. Not following up is what gives some journalists like her a bad name.
-
-
@deniseparashac Obvious that he misinterpreted, or obvious that it was the wrong answer. Either way, an actual journalist follows up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.