@mattklewis Perhaps having a debate on adjusting the 1965 immigration law is a good reset, even if you favor generally high immigration.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis I'm not sure agreeing with 80% of the American public can be described as a "pander".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Enabling him to compromise back where GOP has been (keep high legal immigration, but stricter against illegal immigration)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis So if a GOP candidate calls for reexamining current high legal immigration levels, wouldn't that expand the Overton Window?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis (Personally, I'm in favor of generous legal immigration)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis The GOP largely supported the current high levels of legal immigration, but received no credit for that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis That's because there's no law to discuss. Illegal immigration is already against the law (obviously).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Until now, the conversation has been on what to do about illegal immigration. So talk turns to enforcement, fences, deporting.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.