@brettsinbeverly @PatrickRuffini I mean effectively and seamlessly change the subject in a way that doesn't make news.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
@mattklewis@brettsinbeverly@PatrickRuffini For F's sake, the Oscars are on tomorrow.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis I suspect that a transcript would reveal the exchange went differently than the story framed it. -
@tclowman that may very well be. Still I'm sure he actually said the "I don't know" part at some point. And that's what they're gonna quote.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Question was stupid. But you're fooling yourself if you think that your article resonates with normal people (outside Beltway.)
@mattklewisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Now is not the time to be an intramural literary critic.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Just to be clear, it's untenable that only Republicans are expected to answer these stupid questions. Self respect, media!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis That's your point. But this exchange on TV would've been a big win for@GovWalker. It was deceptively reported in print.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Great, they shouldn't entertain them and they should refuse to talk to reporters who ask them.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis@PatrickRuffini The media is such that no response is acceptable. You mean good candidates like only survivor of recall ever?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.