@mattklewis @MZHemingway @charlescwcooke @instapundit HR38 "provides for consideration" of HR36 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-resolution/38/ … What does that mean?
-
-
@mattklewis@CharmaineYoest@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit Webpage on HR 38 still shows HR 36 will get 1 hour consideration.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis@CharmaineYoest@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit Webpage *could* be wrong, I guess...but why? https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-resolution/38/ … -
@brainfertilizer@CharmaineYoest@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit My understanding is they will vote on a different "pro-life" bill -
@mattklewis@CharmaineYoest@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit Your understanding makes more sense based on flow of information. -
@mattklewis@CharmaineYoest@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit But I'm neophyte enough I'm still stuck on bl&wh text on House website
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis@charlescwcooke@brainfertilizer@MZHemingway@instapundit they are going only with the funding ban bill -
@CharmaineYoest@mattklewis@charlescwcooke@MZHemingway@instapundit I don't doubt you are correct, but how do you know? Website un-updated
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.