Going down in flames?: Shane Osborn decides to lose ugly in Nebraska - http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/12/going-down-in-flames-shane-osborn-decides-to-lose-ugly-in-nebraska/ …pic.twitter.com/lqhG2xDhWP
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@kausmickey isn't this essentially the definition of the word? (I'm not if sure it's always deemed a pejorative.)
@mattklewis Don't think it's definition of the word. Word means disfavoring immigrants (eg discrim) not keeping new immig level @ 1M a year!
@kausmickey I'll look forward to your blog post on this (do you realize you're coming down to the "right" of Sasse, Cruz, Palin and me?).
@mattklewis I'm definitely to "right" of Cruz--he's primed 2 sell out--but I'm not nec. against increasing legal immigration if stop illegal
@kausmickey you seem obsessed with this issue. Maybe go blog something about it? It's not like you don't have an outlet.
@mattklewis That's such a cheap way out of argument you're losing! Your "nativism" charge indefensible.
@kausmickey I don't like having nuanced debates in 140 characters. If you disagree with me on something, feel free to write about it.
@mattklewis oh, you meant "nativism" in a good way!
@kausmickey would "anti-immigration" be more polite?
@mattklewis Still inaccurate--if you want 500,000 new immigrants a year you're not "anti-immigration." I think "restrictionist" is the word
@kausmickey ok, let's see if Osborn's "restrictionist" policies help him beat conservative Ben Sasse tomorrow.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.