@mattklewis Also, if you’ve lost the argument for 40 years on 1st trimester, do you ban anyway if you get a pro-life Congress?
-
-
-
@allahpundit@mattklewis Pro-lifers don't want that (see Bush-era GOP Congress. Priorities: partial-birth ban, judges, funding restrictions) -
@McCormackJohn@mattklewis But if there were 218 for an outright ban in the House and 60 in the Senate, how should GOP prez play it? -
@allahpundit@mattklewis Such a far-out hypothetical, should dismiss as an issue that will not come before him or her. -
@McCormackJohn@mattklewis My bottom line on the clip is that it sounds like this wouldn’t be much of a priority for him. Status quo-ish -
@allahpundit@mattklewis Listened again and discussion of late-term ban "maybe there's a middle ground" is pretty weak. -
@McCormackJohn@mattklewis Yeah, it’s not the policy specifics so much as the “this isn’t a priority” vibe - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis Dems didn’t let public opposition to O-Care stop them in 2010 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis Right, but how much political capital does he intend to spend on the argument? That’s why the clip is interestingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis It amazes me how, after 42 yrs, pro-lifers still fall in trap of talking about rape/incest. That duznt make up 5% of abortions. -
@mattklewis If I give yu that, as a pro-choice person, will u be happy? Simple answer, but it requires some of that nonexistent flexibility.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.