@GlennThrush @TomBevanRCP Also I think Obama's approach requires a better word than "non-interventionist."
-
-
@mattklewis@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP Is the fact that Rs opposed intervention at all relevant in debate over whether O was weak on Syria? -
@ThePlumLineGS@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP Choosing not to intervene doesn't imply weakness. But wavering & vacillating sends other signals. -
@mattklewis@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP We can keep two ideas in heads: 1) "red line" comment was mistake; 2) going to Cong right thing to do -
@mattklewis@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP Peter Baker's piece does a nice job in pointing out inconsistencies of Rs on this stuff. -
@ThePlumLineGS@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP I'll concede Republicans are inconsistent. But he's the president. And he looks very weak. -
@mattklewis@ron_fournier@TomBevanRCP that may be, but what matters most is the policy -
@mattklewis@TomBevanRCP just to clarify (sincerely), argument is if O hadn't said "red line" inaction on Syria would not have looked weak? -
@ThePlumLineGS@TomBevanRCP I don't think choosing not to intervene implies weakness. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.