@mattklewis they don't like the fact that it fudges on how the triggers preceding legalization will work
-
-
-
@mattklewis it doesn't say *what* the triggers preceding legalization will be. See this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/02/03/morning-plum-gop-may-kill-immigration-reform-because-obummer/ … -
@ThePlumLineGS That strikes me as an argument for more specifics -- not an argument against these "principles"... -
@mattklewis oh, agreed. they don't like these principles because they are vague on this core question -
@ThePlumLineGS how can I debate people when we're not operating on the premise that words mean things?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis Most who are against the framework didn't actually READ it. They are just parroting what others have said about it. -
@mattklewis In fact, I had a conversation with someone yesterday opposing "the house immigration bill" as if there is such a thing. -
@VictorB123 Yep. Sounds about right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis And there is a lot of speculation and then speculation about the speculation. Most of the conversation around the issue is noise -
@mattklewis But there are a lot of people just parroting their favorite pundit's position.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis I don't like the GOP's version of border security, no. It's bad enough already.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.