@mattklewis respectfully disagree....I think the field is wide open, and Paul can help to define conservatism. Smaller but smarter.
-
-
-
@JohnFeehery If he does run, it will be interesting (and healthy) to see his non-interventionist foreign policy worldview debated vs Rubios. -
@mattklewis exactly...also, we need to rethink the war on drugs...waste of money and time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis APologies for being Miss McSnarky. Spent last two days reading famine maps, mass rape & war crime reports. All avoidable. -
@MediaLizzy no need to apologize.#TeamLizzy -
@mattklewis Awww, shucks.#TeamMatt You da best!!!! Love the piece, BTW.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis How can Rand Paul not be electable in 2016? Who else are you suggesting? Rubio? Santorum?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Matt, the problem is the left and the complacent media will throw these bombs at anyone we nominate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Because he's hypocritical, unqualified, dangerously ignorant person?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis Because he can't win. -
@joemcclure2@mattklewis There we go again w/d "can't win" b.s. Only reason will be b/c of voter FRAUD, same as in Nov!! Othrwse he can win!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.