. @mattklewis because "optics" is something pundits think about more than voters?
-
-
-
@sethdmichaels Optics matter. It's just that regular folks don't call it "optics." They say, "There's something about that fella..." -
@mattklewis sure, but isn't the simpler answer "his optics aren't that terrible"? Optics aren't an objective law of physics. -
@sethdmichaels What I find notable is that he seems to be defying the "rules" based on what we think we know about history and politics. -
@mattklewis trust goes a long way. the polls point to people liking, trusting Obama and thinking he cares about them more than Romney.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mattklewis Awww yes,George in Crawford,while sacrificing 4804,always made NeoCons look like battered Wives&Yet,TheSameApathyLives InGOP!?:)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@mattklewis ICYMI: Obama's optics are horrible. So why is he still winning? http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/26/obamas-horrible-optics/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis . It’s unbelievable! He's getting a free pass.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis@BarackObama NOT winning except in media head. Anecdotal, very few Obama signs in Michigan and my Obama voters are going MittThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.