I would support moving it to 55 votes—if Dems agreed to keep that in place. That would be an improvement over a simple majority—& is more likely to be achieved. (There’s nothing magic about the number 60.) https://twitter.com/neilcpa/status/1050044767046750208 …
-
-
I don’t think any senate could bind a future one in that way
-
right, on the first day of a new Senate, a simple majority could always set a new rule. But if the "nuclear option" procedural loophole was fixed, it could only be on that day, which might such a a rules change a bigger part of political campaigns.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.