-
-
Ok, then the question becomes what definition are you using? 1 or 2? I don’t think they were a mob in the sense of trying to cause riotous or distructive action, but could agree with the informal definition.pic.twitter.com/6RDm1cUGzs
-
I don't think this makes the point you think it's making. How is harassing people eating peacefully in public not destructive? Is it constructive? Civil disobedience? Just some harmless laughs? PS: I can't stand Ted Cruz, or Trump for that matter. But, c'mon. This isn't hard.
-
They didn’t destroy anything, they disrupted his evening. And I did say that I thought that should be off limits, that’s his private life with his family. If he was at work then they could speak with him or protest but I don’t think they should there. I don’t think that’s a mob
-
That this even needs explained says a lot about how so many have lost all sense of perspective.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely right, Matt. I'd like to have you on air in CLE, please DM me with contact info.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey axxhole, while you’re busy redefining what a mob is based on the republican snowflake mentality will you make time to justify this harassment which includes a lie? When you stop being a hypocrite, Liberals will stop protesting politicians in public!https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1049458659430883328?s=21 …
-
Republican hypocrites whine about Ted Cruz being chased out by a mob but have no issue with harassing someone at work while they try to make a living. What’s the difference between the 2? One works for taxpayers. The other doesn’t!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.