So I’ve tweeted some about Kavanaugh and evidentiary standards and how sure we have to be someone committed a very bad act to reject his nomination. But I haven’t really given my thoughts. Here they are.
-
-
If he were withdrawn without her testifying, yes. If she goes through with testifying, though, that sets a high bar for would-be fabulists.
-
I think there should be an expectation of testimony under oath, though of course if Kavanaugh withdraws before she testifies that's his prerogative.
-
Sure. But as a bar, nobody should expect withdrawal without public testimony.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This question in this context doesn't really credit the strength of Dr. Ford's accusations and the questionable actions of the Kavanaugh team in response--- why oppose a facially-neutral FBI investigation? Why impose an arbitrary timeline? Why expressly attack her?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Not true ffs
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.