What part of the argument do you disagree with?
-
-
-
Which *part*? The entire premise that supporting other Republican politicians is tantamount to covering up for Trump.
-
You disagree that Republican control of Congress means quashing any oversight of numerous cases of misconduct by the administration?
-
As I wrote initially, I think you framed it in the least generous manner possible. Bush probably wants to help elect conservatives who care about taxes, national defense, the right to life, etc. That is legitimate and honorable.
-
What this really means is that they prioritize these things over accountability and oversight on Trump. After all, Republicans themselves have openly said that electing them is necessary to prevent those things from happening.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It may not be generous but it's absolutely true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perfect use of understatement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that kind of insane, or is it just me?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it incorrect though?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.