That being said, I think that if Trump names her (or anyone else on the list of that matter) the debate isn't going to be over qualifications. It's going to be over "precedent" and "stare decisis" which basically means Roe v. Wade.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FWIW, I have no doubt she's intelligent and had no real problem with her being appointed to the Court of Appeals. I'd just prefer to have a more detailed record to make a determination from. Gorsuch had been on the 10th Circuit for almost ten years, just as an example
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mattklewis , like to comment on this?.
pic.twitter.com/Caj7Y85eg4
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
O would go Kethledge here and if/when Ginsburg goes, pick Barret.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What happens if Trump gets his second Supreme Court justice onto the court but then Mueller informs us that Trump is a traitor?
-
I’m totally cool with Pence’s nominations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.