Every headline says “narrowly.” How is a 7-2 decision narrow??? (Or are they talking about the fact that this doesn’t set a broad precedent?)pic.twitter.com/5NFlcZH4xj
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I haven't fully digested the opinion, but yea I think some of the headlines are probably misleading. Pete WIlliams on MSNBC just gave a pretty good summary of the holding.
It’s the kind of thing that makes conservatives paranoid about liberal media bias. (In this case, it could be simply an honest/semantics challenge.)
I think its more likely confusion among reporters and/or news consumers. Also, the tendancy to want to be first in reporting a decision like this often leads to errors. Remember what happened with the Obamacare decision?
I read "rules narrowly" as ruling in a narrow way. Headlines about narrow Supreme Court votes nearly always spell out "In 5-4 decision"
But part of this could just be that I already expected the court to tailor their ruling to the facts in this case and to shy away from broader readings
Not just you. I tweeted out the same thing.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.