Ministers could have unilaterally recognised all EU27-held registrations, licences etc on day one, maintaining inward trade flows. Instead - for good reasons - the May govt rendered the EU a “third country” under strict reciprocity, and copied the location obligations.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
That’s Brexit, you might say, and not necessarily unwise from a regulatory coherence point of view. It might also prove to be temporary. But it will be expensive, and render the U.K. a very different environment on the moment the clock strikes midnight.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Re having to "onshore" the whole system? It was a genuine conundrum I think with few good answers
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Just as "Socialism in One Country" turned out to be its opposite.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I think if you asked leavers, you’d find they want reciprocal free trade. They don’t want a political alliance that sets laws top down. It isn’t about being protectionist - it’s about having choice & maintaining flexibility to enhance the UK’s economic well being.
-
EU laws relate to commerce, and they're what make the single market possible. You can't have the kind of trading relationship that we have now without them. The effect will be protectionist.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.