U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Alphanumeric has two hypothetical advantages. If you pick the password *truly at random* you can get more entropy (strength) from each alpha button press, so your password could be shorter. But those fewer keystrokes come at the cost of squinting at small keys.
But of course we all know that none of you are picking your alphanumeric passcode at random. You’re all using Kitty123.
In all seriousness, if you’re using the alphanumeric option to pick a *non-random* passcode (as most people do) then it’s much harder to tell how much password strength you’re getting. Some, a lot. Some less than they think.
In practice (given the apparent limitations of current iOS attacks) it’s probably fine to use an alphanumeric passcode. It may be very secure. The real question is whether it’s worth the hassle of using the non-numeric keypad.
So in summary: random (long) numeric passcodes may be a more ergonomic choice for a given security level, especially if you force yourself to memorize the thing over a week or two (even if that involves carrying a post-it during that time.) But do whatever works for you.
Are you new to using phones, passwords, brute force?
Yes. Just got my first password Tuesday.
joke's on you i used dual_ec to generate my phone password
That's amazing. I've got the same combination on my luggage!
X-File fan all use TrustNo1. You know that. :)
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
)
