Matthew Green

The principle in question is very clear about this. It says in full: "It should not require secrecy, and it should not be a problem if it falls into enemy hands".

I am afraid to look.

If you look, they fill up your Mentions with chaos.

seeing @aantonop retweet this is a sad moment for me. been following the space since 2013. clearly this space has changed and seeing how both btc and eth failed miserably to deliver on their original vision till today - they are now the establishment which calls for disruption.

Andreas, you are widely respected in this space. I’d love to hear some commentary or dialogue from you regarding your sentiment towards IOTA, a retweet implicitly acknowledges your opinion, but I’m not convinced there is an inherent bias from yourself, Matthew and the Zcash crew?

I'm jelly that Iota is getting all the love from security researchers. Why don't you come attack Zcash instead!

This guy gets it

Auge hier @domschiener

nicht alles glauben was matthew green schreibt. das ist keine vulnerabilität. der geht davon aus, dass man seine addresse re-used, somit ist man ohnehin gefährdet. ähnlich wie bei der DCI lüge vom august. extrem heiß gekochte suppe die den menschen hier gerade in den kram passt.